<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Smart Taxes Network</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smarttaxes.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smarttaxes.org</link>
	<description>developing tax policy for sustainability in Ireland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 22:32:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Links to New Complementary Currency Initiatives by Links to New Complementary Currency Initiatives &#124; The Future of Money &#124; Scoop.it</title>
		<link>http://smarttaxes.org/2011/09/29/links-to-new-currency-initiatives/comment-page-1/#comment-383</link>
		<dc:creator>Links to New Complementary Currency Initiatives &#124; The Future of Money &#124; Scoop.it</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 22:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarttaxes.org/?p=4128#comment-383</guid>
		<description>[...]  Links to New Complementary Currency Initiatives      Compiled by complementary currency expert Ludwig Schuster of livingcity.de Germany.  26.09.2011 YES Magazine (USA) Evergreen Cooperative Corporation Cleveland pays workers 20 percent in cash and 80 percent in &#8220;capital credits&#8221;.     Source: smarttaxes.org [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Links to New Complementary Currency Initiatives      Compiled by complementary currency expert Ludwig Schuster of livingcity.de Germany.  26.09.2011 YES Magazine (USA) Evergreen Cooperative Corporation Cleveland pays workers 20 percent in cash and 80 percent in &ldquo;capital credits&rdquo;.     Source: smarttaxes.org [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Conference &#8220;Lessons from the Crisis: Money, Taxes and Saving in a Changing World&#8221; by Even the Economist now gets Peak Oil and its effect on Growth &#8211; Smart Taxes Network</title>
		<link>http://smarttaxes.org/2011/04/07/conference-lessons-from-the-crisis-money-taxes-and-saving-in-a-changing-world/comment-page-1/#comment-372</link>
		<dc:creator>Even the Economist now gets Peak Oil and its effect on Growth &#8211; Smart Taxes Network</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 12:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarttaxes.org/?p=3437#comment-372</guid>
		<description>[...] system disruption effects.  David will be speaking at the joint Smart Taxes &amp; Tasc  &#8216;Learning from the Crisis&#8217; conference  on May [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] system disruption effects.  David will be speaking at the joint Smart Taxes &amp; Tasc  &#8216;Learning from the Crisis&#8217; conference  on May [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Negative interest rates are easy to do by Adriaan Koreman</title>
		<link>http://smarttaxes.org/2010/11/12/negative-interest-rates-are-easy-to-do/comment-page-1/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>Adriaan Koreman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 22:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarttaxes.org/?p=2639#comment-295</guid>
		<description>MONEY is TIME! (by Adriaan Koreman)

The MELTDOWN of our financial and economic system.


Too many people believe that FREE MARKET ECONOMY and CAPITALISM are one and the same thing.

Capitalism is nothing but a monetary system originating from the use of gold and later deposit slips for gold as a means of exchange.

Free Market Economy is nothing but a natural way of balancing offer and demand by attributing more value to items that are scarce and in demand. It originates from far before capitalism and already existed in the time of barter trade.

Contrary to popular believe: MONEY is TIME! When you earn money, you have given your time in producing something. Or in rendering a service of some kind. Or in trading something. Whatever you did to earn a living, you received money for your time and that money allows you to buy TIME from somebody else. You can buy a product that someone created with his time. Or a service. No matter what …… It is always TIME that you buy!

Part of the time that you can buy for your money has already been transferred into products. A car waiting to be sold. Food in the supermarket. Tools of some kind. Machinery. A house.

But services still to be rendered. Products not yet created. Raw materials not yet extracted from the earth. They are waiting for TIME to be applied to be realised. So when unemployment is skyrocketing we should be so happy! There is so much TIME available! What richness? What wealth for a nation? But are we happy with high unemployment?

TIME when it is not consumed loses it’s value. At a rate of 100 % per day. We are used to transfer the time that we are owed into CAPITAL in order to be able to transfer it back into TIME when we want to buy something or invest it.

But CAPITAL keeps and TIME doesn’t! There is not necessarily a direct relation between the amount of capital available and the amount of products or time that can be purchased with it. In times of euphoria (years 1920, 1960 and 2000), overspending and borrowing increases the total amount of capital available and inflation lurks around the corner. In times of recession (years 1930, 1970 and 2008), so many bad debts have to be written off, that there is an implosion of the amount of capital available and deflation puts our financial system at risk. FED and ECB fight deflation by expanding the available amount of money drastically, but when government spending head starts inflation this tremendous amount of money available could lead to hyper inflation, causing our financial system to meltdown.

In the last three centuries CAPITALISM has produced an enormous increase in our standard of living. But in 1930, 1970 and 2008 it has also produced unacceptable high levels of unemployment in developed countries and high unemployment in most other parts of the world throughout the last century. Because it transfers time owed into CAPITAL and only buys time back when added value can be created, TIME or LABOUR is allowed to be completely lost when it is thought that no profit can be expected.

CAPITAL is only invested when more than 100 % can be expected in return.

TIME would be invested when anything above 0 % can be expected in return.

And that is the reason why CAPITALISM produces high unemployment levels. Transferring TIME owed to us into CAPITAL blocks the possibility to put time to good use when it could produce anything above 0 % in return.

So how can we avoid the MELTDOWN?

Barter trade? Of course not! We live in the 3rd millennium! Even though we still use a monetary system from the 1st and 2nd millennium, with an elementary flaw in it that will finally have to be eliminated!

If CAPITAL or MONEY is to be a means of exchange for TIME, then it should have the same property as TIME! Meaning … it should lose value when it is not consumed within a certain period, just as TIME does! But how to achieve that?

Nothing is easier. Let&#039;s look at a possibility: Substitute V(alue) A(dded) T(ax) by V(alue) D(iminished) T(ax) on money in possession as long as it is not used. A negative interest Tax on money. For that we would hardly have to change our money system. We cannot have cash money and would have to work with digital money in our bank account. But hey! We pay with pin, credit card, chip, internet, mobile phone ….. We are in the 3rd millennium! ATM’s could give out cheques of 5, 10, 20, 50 or 100 Dollar or Euro with our bank account number printed on them. We fill out the date, sign them and use them as money. The first month of negative interest tax is charged from the bank account of the person issuing the cheque. Any subsequent month is charged from the person collecting the cheque into his bank account by filling out his account number and giving it to the bank. Small change can be made from any material with a year and month printed on it, being taxed in the same way as bank cheques. If banks have to keep the total worth of current accounts of their clients for 100 % in their account at the Central Bank, it is easy to tax that account. Banks pass on the tax to their clients. 1 % or 3 % of negative interest tax per month on our current account is not going to make us any poorer if other tax is reduced. But having a monetary system based on negative interest rates allows the Central Bank to give out loans to commercial banks, paying back only 80 % of the money borrowed in fixed amounts per month during 10 years or so. Commercial banks can then give out loans that pay back 83 %, so they are still making a profit. But for that price houses can be built and investments can me made in industry absorbing unemployment. Money invested in stock of banks and industry is still turning a profit. Money in saving accounts, as long as it is invested, still carries positive interest and such accounts don’t change. Substituting VAT by VDT will certainly make us all a lot richer, because unemployment can be avoided by lowering interest rates under 0 % if necessary. Inflation can be avoided by adjusting the negative interest tax on available money to keep spending and investing inline with available products and services.
www.digigeld.webklik.nl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MONEY is TIME! (by Adriaan Koreman)</p>
<p>The MELTDOWN of our financial and economic system.</p>
<p>Too many people believe that FREE MARKET ECONOMY and CAPITALISM are one and the same thing.</p>
<p>Capitalism is nothing but a monetary system originating from the use of gold and later deposit slips for gold as a means of exchange.</p>
<p>Free Market Economy is nothing but a natural way of balancing offer and demand by attributing more value to items that are scarce and in demand. It originates from far before capitalism and already existed in the time of barter trade.</p>
<p>Contrary to popular believe: MONEY is TIME! When you earn money, you have given your time in producing something. Or in rendering a service of some kind. Or in trading something. Whatever you did to earn a living, you received money for your time and that money allows you to buy TIME from somebody else. You can buy a product that someone created with his time. Or a service. No matter what …… It is always TIME that you buy!</p>
<p>Part of the time that you can buy for your money has already been transferred into products. A car waiting to be sold. Food in the supermarket. Tools of some kind. Machinery. A house.</p>
<p>But services still to be rendered. Products not yet created. Raw materials not yet extracted from the earth. They are waiting for TIME to be applied to be realised. So when unemployment is skyrocketing we should be so happy! There is so much TIME available! What richness? What wealth for a nation? But are we happy with high unemployment?</p>
<p>TIME when it is not consumed loses it’s value. At a rate of 100 % per day. We are used to transfer the time that we are owed into CAPITAL in order to be able to transfer it back into TIME when we want to buy something or invest it.</p>
<p>But CAPITAL keeps and TIME doesn’t! There is not necessarily a direct relation between the amount of capital available and the amount of products or time that can be purchased with it. In times of euphoria (years 1920, 1960 and 2000), overspending and borrowing increases the total amount of capital available and inflation lurks around the corner. In times of recession (years 1930, 1970 and 2008), so many bad debts have to be written off, that there is an implosion of the amount of capital available and deflation puts our financial system at risk. FED and ECB fight deflation by expanding the available amount of money drastically, but when government spending head starts inflation this tremendous amount of money available could lead to hyper inflation, causing our financial system to meltdown.</p>
<p>In the last three centuries CAPITALISM has produced an enormous increase in our standard of living. But in 1930, 1970 and 2008 it has also produced unacceptable high levels of unemployment in developed countries and high unemployment in most other parts of the world throughout the last century. Because it transfers time owed into CAPITAL and only buys time back when added value can be created, TIME or LABOUR is allowed to be completely lost when it is thought that no profit can be expected.</p>
<p>CAPITAL is only invested when more than 100 % can be expected in return.</p>
<p>TIME would be invested when anything above 0 % can be expected in return.</p>
<p>And that is the reason why CAPITALISM produces high unemployment levels. Transferring TIME owed to us into CAPITAL blocks the possibility to put time to good use when it could produce anything above 0 % in return.</p>
<p>So how can we avoid the MELTDOWN?</p>
<p>Barter trade? Of course not! We live in the 3rd millennium! Even though we still use a monetary system from the 1st and 2nd millennium, with an elementary flaw in it that will finally have to be eliminated!</p>
<p>If CAPITAL or MONEY is to be a means of exchange for TIME, then it should have the same property as TIME! Meaning … it should lose value when it is not consumed within a certain period, just as TIME does! But how to achieve that?</p>
<p>Nothing is easier. Let&#8217;s look at a possibility: Substitute V(alue) A(dded) T(ax) by V(alue) D(iminished) T(ax) on money in possession as long as it is not used. A negative interest Tax on money. For that we would hardly have to change our money system. We cannot have cash money and would have to work with digital money in our bank account. But hey! We pay with pin, credit card, chip, internet, mobile phone ….. We are in the 3rd millennium! ATM’s could give out cheques of 5, 10, 20, 50 or 100 Dollar or Euro with our bank account number printed on them. We fill out the date, sign them and use them as money. The first month of negative interest tax is charged from the bank account of the person issuing the cheque. Any subsequent month is charged from the person collecting the cheque into his bank account by filling out his account number and giving it to the bank. Small change can be made from any material with a year and month printed on it, being taxed in the same way as bank cheques. If banks have to keep the total worth of current accounts of their clients for 100 % in their account at the Central Bank, it is easy to tax that account. Banks pass on the tax to their clients. 1 % or 3 % of negative interest tax per month on our current account is not going to make us any poorer if other tax is reduced. But having a monetary system based on negative interest rates allows the Central Bank to give out loans to commercial banks, paying back only 80 % of the money borrowed in fixed amounts per month during 10 years or so. Commercial banks can then give out loans that pay back 83 %, so they are still making a profit. But for that price houses can be built and investments can me made in industry absorbing unemployment. Money invested in stock of banks and industry is still turning a profit. Money in saving accounts, as long as it is invested, still carries positive interest and such accounts don’t change. Substituting VAT by VDT will certainly make us all a lot richer, because unemployment can be avoided by lowering interest rates under 0 % if necessary. Inflation can be avoided by adjusting the negative interest tax on available money to keep spending and investing inline with available products and services.<br />
<a href="http://www.digigeld.webklik.nl" rel="nofollow">http://www.digigeld.webklik.nl</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fixing the Eurozone without PIIGS deflation and penury by Mosler on euro endgame &#8211; Smart Taxes Network</title>
		<link>http://smarttaxes.org/2010/05/02/fixing-the-eurozone-without-piigs-deflation-and-penury/comment-page-1/#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>Mosler on euro endgame &#8211; Smart Taxes Network</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarttaxes.org/2010/05/02/fixing-the-eurozone-without-piigs-deflation-and-penury/#comment-254</guid>
		<description>[...] on the Irish / eurozone question outlining a solution as  he and Marshal Auerback have outlined before.  &#8230;My proposal remains the most sensible but not even a consideration- per capita ECB annual [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on the Irish / eurozone question outlining a solution as  he and Marshal Auerback have outlined before.  &#8230;My proposal remains the most sensible but not even a consideration- per capita ECB annual [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Site Value Tax by Smart Taxes Welcomes Announcement of Site Value Tax &#8211; Smart Taxes Network</title>
		<link>http://smarttaxes.org/site-value-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>Smart Taxes Welcomes Announcement of Site Value Tax &#8211; Smart Taxes Network</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 13:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarttaxes.org/#comment-236</guid>
		<description>[...] Site Value Tax [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Site Value Tax [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 46 economists explain why NAMA is wrong in today&#8217;s Irish Times by Vincent Browne Special tonight at 22.30 - Page 9</title>
		<link>http://smarttaxes.org/2009/08/26/46-economists-explain-why-nama-is-wrong-in-todays-irish-times/comment-page-1/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Browne Special tonight at 22.30 - Page 9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 00:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarttaxes.org/?p=1297#comment-224</guid>
		<description>[...] the boot into Karl Whelan, Constantin Gurdgiev, Brian Lucey and the other 46 Economists, who got it so right last year, and he didn&#039;t mind torpedoing Richard Bruton from his own former Party, whose proposals on NAMA he [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the boot into Karl Whelan, Constantin Gurdgiev, Brian Lucey and the other 46 Economists, who got it so right last year, and he didn&#039;t mind torpedoing Richard Bruton from his own former Party, whose proposals on NAMA he [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Paul Grignon&#8217;s &#8220;Money As Debt&#8221; video by dara</title>
		<link>http://smarttaxes.org/2009/03/08/paul-grignons-money-as-debt-video/comment-page-1/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>dara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarttaxes.org/?p=699#comment-211</guid>
		<description>Try here:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2550156453790090544#</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try here:<br />
<a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2550156453790090544#" rel="nofollow">http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2550156453790090544#</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Warren Mosler &#8211; Fixing Ireland by Neil Wilson</title>
		<link>http://smarttaxes.org/2010/11/18/warren-mosler-fixing-ireland/comment-page-1/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 09:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarttaxes.org/?p=2744#comment-210</guid>
		<description>Yeah. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.3spoken.co.uk/2010/09/solution-to-european-debt-crisis.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I mentioned this&lt;/a&gt; the last time Ireland wobbled. Turn &#039;debt&#039; into &#039;money&#039;. Run a parallel currency.

The other option is to request another Act of Union with the UK. We&#039;re generally quite generous with transfer payments to the provinces. Although I suspect, given history, Ireland would rather join Federal Germany first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah. <a href="http://www.3spoken.co.uk/2010/09/solution-to-european-debt-crisis.html" rel="nofollow">I mentioned this</a> the last time Ireland wobbled. Turn &#8216;debt&#8217; into &#8216;money&#8217;. Run a parallel currency.</p>
<p>The other option is to request another Act of Union with the UK. We&#8217;re generally quite generous with transfer payments to the provinces. Although I suspect, given history, Ireland would rather join Federal Germany first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Paul Grignon&#8217;s &#8220;Money As Debt&#8221; video by reader</title>
		<link>http://smarttaxes.org/2009/03/08/paul-grignons-money-as-debt-video/comment-page-1/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarttaxes.org/?p=699#comment-209</guid>
		<description>“Money As Debt.”  link is broken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Money As Debt.”  link is broken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Warren Mosler &#8211; Fixing Ireland by Rodger Malcolm Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://smarttaxes.org/2010/11/18/warren-mosler-fixing-ireland/comment-page-1/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodger Malcolm Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 20:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarttaxes.org/?p=2744#comment-204</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;The purpose of the Smart Taxes project is to develop policy options to reform fiscal and other financial and monetary mechanisms in Ireland to deliver environmental, social and economic sustainability. &quot;&lt;/i&gt;

There is only one long-term solution for Ireland.  Become &lt;a href=&quot;http://rodgermmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/08/13/monetarily-sovereign-the-key-to-understanding-economics/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;   monetarily sovereign &lt;/a&gt; like other members of the EU,  i.e. the U.K., Denmark and Norway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;The purpose of the Smart Taxes project is to develop policy options to reform fiscal and other financial and monetary mechanisms in Ireland to deliver environmental, social and economic sustainability. &#8220;</i></p>
<p>There is only one long-term solution for Ireland.  Become <a href="http://rodgermmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/08/13/monetarily-sovereign-the-key-to-understanding-economics/" rel="nofollow">   monetarily sovereign </a> like other members of the EU,  i.e. the U.K., Denmark and Norway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

