Obama’s Problem Simply Defined: It Was the Banks
Friday, 11/5/2010 – 4:09 pm by James K. Galbraith | 18 Comments
Obama must break his devil’s pact with the banks in order to succeed.
Bruce Bartlett says it was a failure to focus. Paul Krugman says it was a failure of nerve. Nancy Pelosi says it was the economy’s failure. Barack Obama says it was his own failure — to explain that he was, in fact, focused on the economy.
As Krugman rightly stipulates, Monday-morning quarterbacks should say exactly what different play they would have called. Paul’s answer is that the stimulus package should have been bigger. No disagreement: I was one voice calling for a much larger program back when. Yet this answer is not sufficient.
The original sin of Obama’s presidency was to assign economic policy to a closed circle of bank-friendly economists and Bush carryovers. Larry Summers. Timothy Geithner. Ben Bernanke. These men had no personal commitment to the goal of an early recovery, no stake in the Democratic Party, no interest in the larger success of Barack Obama. Their primary goal, instead, was and remains to protect their own past decisions and their own professional futures.
Recent Posts
- Cap and Dividend: A Way to Save the Climate that Can Succeed
- Put Ireland’s Natural Resources in Trust for the People
- No to Minister Rabbitte’s Plan to Sell Off the Irish People’s Wind Power to the UK
- Site Value Tax Petition to Minister Noonan
- It isn’t too late…a plea to make a decision in favour of Site Value Tax
Tags
bad-bank
bail-out
banking crisis,
banks
bond market
commons
credit-default-swaps
crisis
currency
currency vlaue
debt
debt issues,
deficit
deflation
ECB
EMU
EU
eurozone
fossil-energy
Germany
global
IMF
inflation
Ireland
land-rent
land-value-tax
local
LVT
MMT
monetary-reform
money
money-creation
mortgages
NAMA
News
property
public sector
recapitalisation
reform
rescue
stimulus
UK
unemployment
US
Videos